September 2021Vol. 22, No. 8Strengthen Your State's Use of Data Evidence to Assess and Demonstrate Systemic Factor Functioning
Written by Steve Lao, M.P.H., child welfare data specialist, and Elizabeth Jones-Ferguson, M.S.W., child welfare data specialist lead, CWRP contractors for the Children's Bureau Child and Family Services Review team
- Is the state's vision for its child welfare system well-communicated and well-understood?
- Are system structures, programs, processes, and practices aligned with the vision?
- To what extent do system structures and processes produce desired results?
- How well does the state meaningfully engage key stakeholders-such as families and youth with lived experience in the child welfare system, judicial and legal communities, tribes, resource families, and services providers-in the design, operation, evaluation, and improvement process?
- To what extent does the state's continuous quality improvement (CQI) system adhere to best practices in measurement and implementation?
- How well does the state employ a systematic approach to understand and address potential disparities different populations experience that may contribute to inequity in services and outcomes for historically underserved populations?
- How well does the state integrate and build on findings and improvement strategies across past and present federal and state plans and reports (e.g., Child and Family Services Plans [CFSPs], Annual Progress and Services Reports [APSRs], Court Improvement Program Strategic Plans)?
- Reliance on quality and relevant data and use of evidence to evaluate and demonstrate outcome performance and systemic factor functioning
- Broad and meaningful involvement from child welfare system stakeholders, partners, and persons with lived expertise
- Determine the availability of data-or the need to obtain or collect data-to understand system dynamics, outcome performance, and the routine statewide functioning of systemic factors
- Routinely review state administrative data regarding the performance on the statewide data indicators and supplemental context data to assess system performance
- Ask questions and follow up on focus areas using the wealth of additional quantitative and qualitative data housed by the agency, judicial and legal communities, service providers, and other system partners to help identify potential drivers of system strengths and challenges
- Apply sound measurement principles in the development and use of data resources, such as knowing the questions that need to be answered, selecting the appropriate population for measurement, assessing data quality, and specifying measurement methods (e.g., measure, time period, population)
- Determine which part of the CQI change and implementation phase the state is in for each focus area, and complete or revisit associated steps for that phase
- Determine which combinations of data analyses provide the most compelling evidence to support the state's observation of system performance and systemic factor functioning and how best to articulate that in writing
- Systemic Factors-Results From the CFSRs: 2015-2018
- Strategic Planning in Child Welfare: Strategies for Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement
- Change and Implementation in Practice
- CFSR Official Reports and Results
- State CFSP and APSR Database
- CFSR Round 3 Statewide Data Indicators
- Child Welfare Outcomes Report Data